Newsletters

What is it really like for some children to learn at school?  Check out Misunderstood Minds at PBS -

The following is reprinted from the Misunderstood Minds website - a link to the site follows, please visit the site for some interactive computer based simulations of various learning disabilities.

Introduction

Millions of American children struggle in school daily because of serious learning problems. The causes are often unknown, specific problems can be difficult to pinpoint, and the long-term effects hard to predict.

Research in the field of learning problems took off in the 1960s, when the first federal funds were earmarked to support children with specific learning disabilities. Experts know more now than ever before, but the evolution of that knowledge also parallels the rise of standardized tests and the current era of high-stakes testing. The tension between the demand for academic success and the stubborn reality of a problem makes learning difficulties one of the most contentious topics in an increasingly competitive and educated society.

It comes as no surprise that when a child can't read or write or pay attention -- and when the problem doesn't go away -- parents, educators, experts, and policymakers often collide in an earnest struggle to find answers.

The landscape of learning problems encompasses a range of expert opinions. Different approaches to terminology and treatment reflect that range. Some learning specialists use the phrase "learning differences" to describe cognitive strengths and weaknesses without labels that they believe may erode children's self-esteem and motivation to succeed. Neurologists and other learning specialists prefer the phrase "learning disabilities" to describe specific neurocognitive breakdowns in otherwise bright children and to underscore the existence of disabling conditions.

In the middle of this landscape there is common ground. Everyone agrees that "disability" is a term with legal ramifications; virtually all of the funding to support children with specific problems is tied to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. And while learning differences and disabilities don't go away, the research and work of learning experts in the last 40 years translates into effective strategies that help children succeed.

This site is a companion to the PBS special Misunderstood Minds, and profiles a variety of learning problems and expert opinions. It is designed to give parents and teachers a better understanding of learning processes, insights into difficulties, and strategies for responding.

We gratefully acknowledge the advisors whose work helped shape this site: Dr. Michael Rivkin, Dr. David Urion, Ellen Boiselle, M.A., and Maria Marolda, M.A., from the Neurology and Learning Disabilities Program at Children's Hospital, Boston; Dr. Mel Levine and Melissa Wakely, M.A., Ph.D., from All Kinds of Minds; James Wendorf from the National Center for Learning Disabilities; and Dr. Lynn Meltzer and Joan Steinberg, M. Ed., from the Institute for Learning and Development and Research ILD.

 http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/misunderstoodminds/attention.html

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

ELEMENTARY TRANSISTION - HOW DOES THIS AFFECT SPECIAL EDUCATION IN THE PASD?

 

The following is a copy of the letter I prepared for the School Board members and School Administrators on behalf of SPEED STEP.  My intention was to speak on behalf of several parents who have approached me on this specific issue and on behalf of SPEED STEP in my encouragement of these decision makers to fully consider the impact of such difficult decisions on the educational needs of special education students.  If you have additional points to make, or have an opinion that is not reflected in my letter, please feel free to contact the board members with your opinion, or contact me before I speak to the board on Monday the 11th.

Kim@olypentitle.com

 

 

 

December 5, 2006 

 

Port Angeles School District

School Board

Administration

Facilities Committee

 

My name is Kim Ortloff.  I am the parent of a special needs child and the founder and current president of the Port Angeles SPEED STEP, a student, parent, therapist, teacher organization working for the benefit of special education in the Port Angeles School District.  Many members of our organization have called me with concerns regarding the proposed move of the special education programs currently housed at Franklin Elementary School.  I am writing on behalf of the parents and SPEED STEP to make you aware of these concerns and to propose a financially advantageous alternative to moving these programs. I feel this alternative is more responsive to the individual educational needs of the children currently served by or who may need the services of these programs in the future. 

 

We are concerned that certain costs of moving these programs have not been fully addressed; including substantial renovations necessary to accommodate the diapering and toileting facilities, physical and occupational therapy, and accessible playground structures.  If the current middle school program at Roosevelt is moved to Stevens, a classroom with toileting and diapering facilities will need to be established.  If the current middle school program stays at Roosevelt and the self contained program for students with multiple disabilities (now called the “life skills” program) is moved to Roosevelt, a room with diapering and toileting facilities will be needed.  If both self-contained classes are moved to Roosevelt, the classroom for students with milder needs also needs to have toileting capabilities, since that classroom also has students in diapers and in a wheelchair, in need of those facilities.  It is not possible for the self contained classes to share the current classroom’s bathroom and changing table at Roosevelt.  There are too many students in need of the toilet and changing table.  It would be too disruptive, interfering with the students’ ability to benefit from the educational opportunities of the program.  It would also be hard on students from the other class to have to interrupt the class, coming through with an aide every time they needed to use these facilities.  We don’t ask typically developing students to announce to the class every time they need to use the bathroom.  Rooms 1 and 2 at Franklin have already been modified to meet these needs.  Should the program be moved, they will need to be altered to become “regular” classrooms. Room 1 would need the changing table removed and a small wall and door added for the bathroom. A corner of room 2 has a bathroom with a shower in it that would need to be removed. 

 

If the self-contained programs move to Roosevelt a room would need to be set up for therapists and itinerants, including a ceiling suspension system for Occupational and Physical Therapy work.  This accommodation has already been made at Franklin

 

An adapted playground would need to be put in place at Roosevelt close to the school, within an appropriate travel distance from the classroom for the students in wheelchairs and students with other mobility issues keeping in mind that there is limited staff support for mobility assistance.  The play equipment at Franklin is right outside the building on an accessible surface.  Appropriate and accessible play equipment is crucial for physical development, growth of independence, social development, and sensory input.  It is also very expensive.  There are several parents within our group that would like to take up the cause of finding funding for this type of equipment for the district.  However, when the special ed programs are continually moved from school to school to accommodate other programs, we hesitate to donate such expensive fixtures that can not be moved with the kids.

 

Beyond the initial costs of preparing the Roosevelt facility to house these programs, there is the potential for ongoing costs as a result of this move.  Each student in these programs is on an Individual Education Plan.  The plan is individual to the educational needs of the student, not the program in which they are currently served.  These IEPs will need to be reviewed by the respective IEP teams to determine if the present program still meets the needs and goals of the student in its new location.  You may have students who are currently served well by the program at Franklin who subsequent to the move would be better served in the less restrictive environment of a general education class with a one to one aide rather than changing locations.  For example, a student in the self- contained classroom at Franklin who is making substantial gain on IEP goals of independence and social skills because of her inclusion for parts of the day in a general education setting might now be better served by being placed in that same general education setting with known peers and a one to one aide rather than moving with the program to a new school where there is likely to be regression in these IEP goals.  Or if such a student is moved with the program and then regresses, there is the cost of additional services and therapies to stem the regression and put the student back on track.  What about the costs associated with a medically fragile student whose IEP calls on the use of paramedics to administer certain drugs when needed in an emergency situation?   This could mean the need to develop a special program for this student to meet her needs within the city limits where paramedics are always available to respond from the city fire station rather than relying on Fire District 2 volunteers whose locations may be too far away.  If we ignore this possibility and move such a student to Roosevelt, who will be liable when the paramedics can’t get there in time?  Or when the one rout from Roosevelt to OMC is blocked and the student can’t be transported?

 

There are also more intangible costs that the students will bare if the programs are moved from Franklin.  The district has an amazing resource in Principal Nancy Pack.  In addition to her administrative strengths, she brought with her a tremendous amount of experience and expertise in special education.  She understands the educational needs of these students.  She is familiar with concerns that general educators might have regarding working with a special needs child in a general education setting.  She has practical suggestions and ideas to accommodate the transition and most of all she knows the value of inclusion first hand for both special needs children and their typically developing peers.  It would truly be a waste of resources to remove all of the special education programs from Ms. Pack’s supervision.  The kids in these programs have become a part of the community at Franklin.  They are known to staff and fellow students and have had opportunities to interact and make friends with their typical peers through inclusion in general education classes or student helpers coming into the contained classrooms.  All parents worry about the social impact of moving their child to a new school, but for these kids it is much more difficult.  Not only do they have to get past their fears and insecurities as well as their physical differences, they have to help others get past them as well to see the person they are.  That is a lot to ask of an elementary school student.  Severing the bonds they have already made with their typical peers will be infinitely more damaging to these kids than to others in the general education population.  For some of these kids, the impact will be compounded when they have to change schools again the following year for 7th grade.  Let’s not forget that some of these kids were in the move from Monroe to Franklin.  Parents remember firsthand how difficult that transition was, how many additional services were needed, how long it took to get some of the kids functioning at their pre-move levels.  Moving such a child again without a plan for all sorts of additional support is tantamount to proactively causing regression and sending the child into the socially awkward middle school years with even more strikes against her – long term problems that are preventable today. 

 

How do we avoid these problems and costs?  We are proposing a variation to the current Option D under consideration. 

 

 

 

 

Option D Variation

FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY

 

22 INSIDE ROOMS 4 PORTABLE ROOMS =26

 

Number of Rooms:

14        2 unit k-6 general education classrooms- from Franklin’s attendance area             

  5        MAC program (beginning at 2nd grade, as is currently done) 2nd-6th district             program                

  5        Maintain current Spec. Ed. classrooms                                   

              One Service room OT, PT, SLP, TVI vision 

              Two Self contained rooms

              Two Resource rooms (one of these could be a bubble classroom)

  1        Band and Music room                                                                       

            Gen. Music will use room 14 (Ben Franklin) and music tech in the library             during the One period a day that band is in the music room

  1        Strings room  

 

26                                         

 

  

Option D Variation keeps Franklin from becoming more crowded than it is currently (in option D Franklin would gain additional students even though losing spec. ed.).  In option D variation plan Franklin becomes a 2.8 unit school with the MAC starting at 2nd grade.  MAC remains a district program beginning in 2nd grade with the 5 elementary schools sending 4-5 students each, totaling 20-25 students who will then be the cohort group in the MAC through 6th grade.  As the MAC loses students, spots could be filled by lottery drawing of interested families from the 5 elementary schools (same as what is done now)  Attrition could also be used to balance class size at Franklin before opening to other schools, as a way of handling “bubbles”.  If the MAC remains a district program, it would solve the dilemma of whether to return out of area students to their home schools next year if the MAC becomes a Franklin program. This is a sticky question once the new boundaries are determined.  If the MAC becomes a Franklin program, do we return all out of area students to their home schools, including current MAC students?  Or did we commit to the MAC families when we accepted them into the MAC program?

 

Option D Variation eliminates the need to make renovations for special education at Franklin or Roosevelt.  The Physical and Occupational Therapy room is already set-up.  The play equipment is already installed in an appropriate location.  The IEP teams will not need to review facility and location impact on the students unless there is a significant change in the student’s needs.  The students and staff will continue to benefit from Ms. Pack’s special expertise.  Relationships between students will be maintained and carried into middle school.  Parents will know that the district takes the impact of its decisions on special needs kids seriously and that they are not simply an afterthought to be worked around.  Knowing that the district is committed to providing these programs a home will make it easier to find funding for special equipment and tools that must be affixed to school property. 

 

We know that as parents of special needs kids we are engrossed in the well being and opportunities of our children.  What we hope to convey to you is that it is not idle preoccupation.  We are in a daily fight for the quality of our kids’ lives, not only for today, but for the rest of their lives.  We don’t have any time to waste; what happens today will have a significant impact on our kids’ ability for further education, gainful employment and independent living.  This is our responsibility and yours. 


Thank you for your time and consideration.  If you have questions or would like to discuss this issue further before the school board meeting on Tuesday, please feel free to contact me directly.  I look forward to the opportunity to work with you on this and future special education issues.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Kimberly Ortloff                    

Kim@olypentitle.com

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

SPEED STEP

GENERAL MEETING

MINUTES

 

September 26, 2006

Port Angeles Senior Center

6:30 pm

 

 

Present:           Kim Ortloff, Kelly Carr, Margi Ahlgren,

                        Maria White, Deb Myers, Julie Rael,

Holli Hilt, Pam and Paul Cunningham, Kathi Fors, Marti Kavadaf, Kim Davis, Mac McIntyre, Dorine Hunter, Dottie Spring

 

I.                 Introduction:

A.        Kim welcomed previous and new members to the meeting and discussed the purpose/mission of Speed Step as a support group for parents and educators as well as their special needs children/students.

 

II.               Old Business:

A.        SPEED STEP Web Site:  www.paspeedstep.org.

B.          Kim announced the elected officers as President, Kim Ortloff and                       Vice President, Martha Hurd. A request for volunteers to take on the                   vacant positions of secretary and treasurer was made.

 

C.          Brainstorming suggestions included Parent Advocacy Training, educating

parents with special need students, parent chat nights, and the future meeting location of Speed Step.

 

III.             New Business:

            A.        Announcements

·       A request for each member to fill out the Needs and Wants Survey was made.

·       Several seminars/trainings and conferences are being held in September and October of which include the WRIGHTSLAW Seminar, AAC training, FACT seminar, FACT follow-up, Unity training, and Beyond the Basics (morning) and Implementation Ideas (afternoon).  Flyers are available for specific dates and times.

·       Deb announced that parents in need of financial assistance with conferences and hotel expenses could contact the DDD in Port Angeles.

·       Kim announced future donations from local businesses may be a possibility after the organization accesses a 503C status.

·       Speed Step’s role within the Port Angeles PTO was discussed as being a venue for parents and educators of special needs children/students to act as an advocate for Speed Step.  This would open inclusion opportunities for Speed Step to join issues with the general school PTO.  It would also allow more opportunities for our kids to be included with general education provisions supplied by the PTO specifically for special need students.

·       Discussion regarding the Washington Initiative for supported Employment info on legal issues.  Transition of minor children to legal age 18.

 

B.        Fall Program

·        

 

            C.        Fundraising

·       Grant writing to outside corporations.

·       Shopping coupons

 

            D.        Winter party and other

·       Interest in having a party for families of special need students.

·       Award (Recognition) Ceremony for parents, children, and educators.

·       Marty volunteered to check on having the Port Angeles Symphony put together an evening of music for parents and children. 

 

            E.         Parent Chat Night

·       Consensus of the members that the meeting would run 30 minutes and the remaining 30 minutes would be designated for parents’ coffee and chat night.

 

            F.         Other

·       Kim announced that her sister will be providing free yoga classes for parents in the near future.

·       Discussion on membership communication.  Members agreed that the web site was the best device.

·       One of the members questioned whether Speed Step will require membership dues.  Kim verified that no dues will be required.

 

IV.       Next meeting will continue to meet at the Port Angeles Senior Center on the 4th

            Tuesday in October (October 24th).

(HAS BEEN MOVED TO 6:30PM AT CAFE GARDEN)

 

Meeting Adjourned

 

 

_____________________________

 

BACK TO SCHOOL

 

As the summer wanes, we look forward to the new school year with hope and trepidation.  Starting a new year is both exciting and anxiety provoking for most kids.  For some kids, it is much harder.  To paraphrase from The Princess Diaries (yes we have watched too much tv this summer), bravery is not the absence of fear, but the realization that some things are more important than the fear they provoke.  To our brave students, hopeful anxious parents and supportive team members - we salute you.  Welcome back to school.

 The following article is reprinted with the author's permission.  Here is an example of back to school transition and triumph - as good as it gets.  

 

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

The good hands people

I'm bumping the threat level back down to blue.

Today was the first day of first grade. Bud and I woke around
5:15, which gave us plenty of time to get ready to be out the door by 7:30. For most of the morning, Bud was upbeat and positive; he sang several verses of "To School We Go" from the Blue Takes You To School Blues Clues DVD. He even posed for first-day-of-school pictures.

His anxiety surfaced when it was time to leave the house. He'd been watching an episode of Clifford's Puppy Days in which Jorge the dog was nervous about a visit to the grooming shop. Bud echoed Jorge all the way out to the car: "I don't want to gooooooooooo!"

His anxiety escalated again when we arrived at school and saw the swarms of parents and children streaming into the building. I made the mistake of parking near the front entrance, which left us no other choice but joining the swarm.

"I don't want to go," said Bud as I helped him out of the car.

"I know, sweetie, " I said. "But it will be okay."

"It will be okay," he echoed, adding the promise he hears me make so often: "If it's too crowded, we can leave."

"It will be crowded," I said. "But then all the moms and dads will leave, and it will just be kids and teachers. Then it won't be crowded anymore."

"And you will stay with me," he added, "so it's okay."

"No, I'll need to leave with the other moms and dads. But I will be back when school is over and it's time to go home."

He knew all of this. This was not news to him. The reminder may have been comforting for him. It was not comforting for me; my heart broke a little more with every word we spoke.

We walked through the hallway, Bud a pace or two behind me, being pulled along quietly by the hand. He stopped when we reached the classroom door and announced more boldly, "I don't want to go! I don't want you to go!"

I pushed him into the classroom, which was already bustling with happy children and excited parents. I heard "Hi, Bud!" and turned to see that Clay was greeting him, but keeping his distance and giving Bud space.

Bud stared at the ground and I could see that he was starting to get overwhelmed. I knew that we needed to get the transition portion of the morning over as quickly as possible. Mrs. Parker spotted us and came right over. I kissed Bud and told him that I'd see him soon, then walked out quickly as Mrs. Parker led Bud to his cubby.

My throat tightened as I made my way back through the school. I marveled at the parents who filled the hallways, chatting, laughing, and snapping pictures as though this was not the most difficult day of their lives. As I approached the exit I saw Miss Josephs, Bud's former classroom aide, who took one look at my swimming eyes and gave me a hug.

"Can you check on him?" I croaked.

"I'm afraid it might be harder for him if he saw me," she said. I knew she was right. I walked out the door feeling crushed under the weight of alone-ness. I wondered if Bud felt it too.

I made it to the car before I burst into tears.

I enjoyed a good, therapeutic cry all the way to my office. As soon as I got to my desk I picked up the phone to call the school, thinking that maybe somebody from the special ed team could make sure he was okay.

The inclusion coordinator answered, and with my voice breaking I squeaked out my request: "Could somebody just go check on him?"

"I was just there," she said. "Mrs. Parker is giving the class an introduction. Bud is walking around the classroom, but he's listening. He's not upset. He's doing just fine."

I felt the tension start to ease as the picture I'd imagined of a hysterical, abandoned Bud disappeared. Feeling a little braver, I rushed off to a meeting.

When I returned two hours later, there was a message on my voice mail from his speech pathologist. "I just wanted to give you a good-news report," she said. "He just came in from recess. He had fun outside and made a smooth transition back to the classroom. He's doing really well."

About an hour later there was another voice mail on my phone, this time from his case manager: "I just passed the classroom. He's eating his snack, looking around, and smiling. I caught Mrs. Parker's eye and she gave me a thumbs-up. He's doing great."

A few minutes ago, Mrs. Parker called. The children were in the art room, and she wanted to call to let me know what a fantastic day Bud was having. "He is exceeding my wildest dreams," she said. "He's spent time at his desk, he's been writing, he's using spontaneous language, he's making eye contact, he's connecting well with the classroom aide. The day could not have gone better."

They get it. They're invested. They're on it. It's working.

He's having a great day.

I can't imagine a better birthday present.

______________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Subscribe to the Newsletter
I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy
Currently, there are no Published Newsletters.

NOTES FROM THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING

 

The following is the agenda from our June organizational meeting.  I've highlighted ideas that came up in the meeting in RED.

 

SPED PTSO

June 7, 2006

 

AGENDA

 

I.      Introductions

Kim Ortloff, Linda Williams, Ellen Fetchiet, Colleen Brastad, Martha Hurd, Becky Brand, Julie Rael,          Deb Meyer

 

II.     Needs/Ideas *

            See Ideas below

III.    Mission Statement

         Group will think about this now and

         get back to it at a later date.

IV.    Getting Started

                 President – Kim Ortloff

                 VP – Martha Hurd

                 Secretary

                 Treasurer

                 Newsletter Editor

                 PTO Liaisons

                

                 Web designer

                 Fundraising committee

                 Other – publications (tri-fold)

 

V.     Fall Kick-Off

           Looking for attractive presentation  

           to get students, parents, therapists

           and educators to check us out.

 

 

*SPED PTSO IDEAS

 

 

 

1.  Fall education – SPED Lawyer on IEP process: an introduction for parents, educators, and administrators (program for SPED PTSO)

            RTI – response to intervention

            Assistive Technology – Ann Nolan

            Insurance issues/information

            Parent partnership / Positive Behavior Support –

                       Lydia Harrison

            IDEA – Chris Hurst

            Special Ed Mediation Training

            WEA Parent Training

            Social Skills Training

           

 

2.  Inclusion outreach – get 2 SPED PTSO members to liaison with PTO at each school – report back to SPED Secretary for newsletter update, look for opportunities for joint projects that promote inclusion

 

3.  Poll the SPED population to see who would take advantage of local pediatric occupational therapy – sensory integration therapy.  Use data in presentation to local hospital board / hospital foundation.

            All three parents in attendance indicate they would use this service

 

4.  SPED PTSO website, message board, list serve – look for donated hosting service

            Include Service and Resource Directory

 

5.  Roundtables – quarterly meetings to discuss what is working, what is not, ideas for making things better – learn from those ahead of you, learn from students, learn from teachers – support implementation of new innovative ideas.

            Special Ed Chat Nights with child care

 

6.  Community outreach – getting the word out, kids’ fest, public speaking, benefits, radio, PDN, community events

 

7.  Fundraising ideas

            -  Mostly Mozart symphony or small ensemble benefit for SPED PTSO

            -  Circus School benefit

            -  Band Aide

            -  Disney Raffle

            -  Theater production of the Churkendoose

 

8.  Inclusion opportunities for everyone

 

9.  Legislative Awareness

 

10.  Scholarship opportunities

             - General Ed teachers to take special ed classes

            -  Special Ed teachers to get further training

            -  Special Ed kids to get into special programs (i.e. - summer camps)

 

11.  In-service trainings – contact Michelle Reed

            - The Inclusive Classroom

            - Differentiation of the curriculum

            - Dealing with difficult behaviors – reading the signs before the flair-up

            - Assuming Competence

                        Accommodations and Modifications

                        Deborah Gray, Behavior Therapist –

                           attachment therapy

                        Ron Feterichi

 

11.  Thinking School Summer Camp – pick up where ESY leaves off

            Co-operative (parental involvement)

 

12.  Sibshop –a program for the siblings of special ed kids to meet and share what their experiences are with a moderator trained in this area (started in Seattle / Featured on Nightline 6/6)

 

Project Lifesaver program – works through law enforcement to locate missing persons via electronic triangulation.  Community investment to put system in place, individual investment to sign individual up for the program. 

 

Powered by CoolBuild.com